dc.contributor.author | TYSON, CJ | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-05-06T14:49:44Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2013-10 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0176-1714 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/7399 | |
dc.description.abstract | We consider two-stage “shortlisting procedures” in which the menu of alternatives is first pruned by some process or criterion and then a binary relation is maximized. Given a particular first-stage process, our main result supplies a necessary and sufficient condition for choice data to be consistent with a procedure in the designated class. This result applies to any class of procedures with a certain lattice structure, including the cases of “consideration filters,” “satisficing with salience effects,” and “rational shortlist methods.” The theory avoids background assumptions made for mathematical convenience; in this and other respects following Richter’s classical analysis of preference-maximizing choice in the absence of shortlisting. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 941 - 963 (22) | en_US |
dc.language | English | en_US |
dc.publisher | Springer Berlin-Heidelberg | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Social Choice and Welfare | en_US |
dc.title | Behavioral implications of shortlisting procedures | en_US |
dc.type | Article | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s00355-012-0704-0 | en_US |
pubs.issue | 4 | en_US |
pubs.notes | No embargo | en_US |
pubs.publication-status | Published | en_US |
pubs.publisher-url | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00355-012-0704-0 | en_US |
pubs.volume | 41 | en_US |