Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorParimalam, Shehan
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-09T13:10:43Z
dc.date.available2021-09-09T13:10:43Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.urihttps://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/73945
dc.description.abstractThe protection of IP rights has always caused friction between the interests of rightsholders and consumers. To aid in alleviating this tension, the various branches of IP law have developed their own doctrines of exhaustion. Regarding European Union (“EU”) trade mark law, the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) authoritatively considers the EU Trade Mark Directive (“EUTMD”) and EU Trade Mark Regulation (“EUTMR”) as adopting a model of regional exhaustion. However, the author considers that following Case C-129/17 “Mitsubishi”, the CJEU has illegitimately extended the scope of EU trade mark law to cover situations that, when properly considered, ought to be dealt with under the national laws of EU Member States as unfair competition issues. The following exposition shall substantiate this claim.en_US
dc.publisherQueen Mary University of London - School of Lawen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/*
dc.titleTrade Mark Infringement or Unfair Commercial Conduct? The Complications of Case C-129/17 “Mitsubishi”en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2021, The Author(s)
dc.rights.holder© 2021, The Author(s)
dc.identifier.doi10.26494/QMLJ3945
rioxxterms.funderDefault funderen_US
rioxxterms.identifier.projectDefault projecten_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States