Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLim, SHen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-15T13:46:09Z
dc.date.available2020-12-18en_US
dc.identifier.issn1941-1383en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/69775
dc.description.abstractIn representative democracies, a variety of rules are employed to select and retain public officials to reflect public preferences over policies. We discuss the literature on selection and retention rules for government officials, focusing on low-information offices. First, we overview the historical origins and the scope of the variation in selection and retention rules. Second, we provide conceptual frameworks for assessing the advantages and disadvantages of direct elections and discuss various factors that influence the functioning of elections. Third, we present empirical regularities. We summarize the baseline effects of the institutional variation and their interaction with factors such as media and compensation. Finally, we discuss outstanding questions on theoretical and empirical fronts, and how the digitization of government information and advances in machine learning can open up new avenues for research.
dc.publisherAnnual Reviewsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAnnual Review of Economicsen_US
dc.rightsThis is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version accepted for publication in Annual Review of Economics following peer review. The version of record is available https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev-economics-072720-041256
dc.titleWhat Shapes the Quality and Behavior of Government Officials? Institutional Variation in Selection and Retention Methodsen_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.holder© 2021 by Annual Reviews. All rights reserved
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusAccepteden_US
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-12-18en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record