Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorShiach, M
dc.contributor.authorPoli, K
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-10T16:44:31Z
dc.date.available2020-12-01
dc.date.available2020-12-10T16:44:31Z
dc.date.issued2020-12-15
dc.identifier.issn2663-5771
dc.identifier.urihttps://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/69254
dc.description.abstractThis article presents a comparative analysis of ten creative hubs located in London, Birmingham, and São Paulo. It expolores how cultural policies in the UK and Brazil have constituted in distinct ways the boundaries between ‘culture’ and ‘innovation’. Pierre Bourdieu’s concepts of ‘field’, ‘habitus’, and ‘capital’ inform this analysis and its account of the ‘cultural-production subfield’ and the ‘innovation-production subfield’ within the creative economies and cultural policies of the UK and Brazil. The article also draws on Pier Luigi Sacco’s cultural history and theory to make an argument about the key factors underpinning recent changes in cultural policy.en_US
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherENCATCen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Journal of Cultural Management and Policy
dc.rightsCreative Commons License CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
dc.subjectCultural Policiesen_US
dc.subjectcreative hubsen_US
dc.subjectInnovationen_US
dc.subjectPierre Bourdieuen_US
dc.subjectCultural Capitalen_US
dc.titleCreative Hubs and Cultural Policies: A Comparison Between Brazil and the United Kingdomen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
pubs.issue2en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusAccepteden_US
pubs.publisher-urlhttps://www.encatc.org/en/resources/encatc-journal/en_US
pubs.volume10en_US
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-12-01
qmul.funderCreative Hubs and Urban Development Goals (UK/Brazil)::Arts and Humanities Research Councilen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record