Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBonfiglioli, Aen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-30T15:02:55Z
dc.date.issued2020-01-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn0165-1889en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/63872
dc.description.abstract© 2020 This paper provides a series of comments aimed mainly at addressing the empirical relevance of the proposed interpretation of the mechanism and partly at considering the possible interaction between the trade and labor market reforms that took place in Colombia in the same period. In particular, it first highlights the stylized facts about Colombian exports and exporters that the model aims to theoretically reconcile and I briefly summarize the mechanism proposed in the microeconomic block of the theory. Next, it focuses on two crucial assumptions made in the model; it proposes a complementary way of presenting the mechanism and proposes ways to evaluate the empirical relevance on the competing interpretations. Finally, it focuses on the broader economic and institutional background characterizing Colombia in the early Nineties and highlights the possibility that other reforms taking place in the same years may have interacted with trade liberalization in shaping firms' distribution and export dynamics as well as welfare.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Economic Dynamics and Controlen_US
dc.titleComment on “Trade integration in Colombia: A dynamic general equilibrium study with new exporter dynamics” by George Alessandria and Oscar Avilaen_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jedc.2020.103872en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden_US
rioxxterms.funderDefault funderen_US
rioxxterms.identifier.projectDefault projecten_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record