Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWitting, Cen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-12T15:05:57Z
dc.date.available2019-03-15en_US
dc.identifier.issn0261-3875en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/59020
dc.description.abstractThis article identifies two paradigms of vicarious liability. One is an established paradigm of ‘liberal agency’ found in cases where owner-managers ‘act through’ workers, with whom they have personal relations, in undertaking work tasks. The second paradigm is found in cases concerning bureaucratic organisations, which are characterised by chains of command and variegated decision-making procedures. Courts have grounded organisational responsibility in features such as structure, hierarchy, and control, which this article uses to construct a model of the ‘deterrable organisation’. The deterrable organisation has important capacities to effect change in behaviour that courts rely upon in order to prevent worker wrongdoing. The article tests the viability of the model against the empirical literature and argues that courts could improve outcomes by a more targeted use of powers to award remedies.en_US
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.publisherCambridge University Press (CUP)en_US
dc.relation.ispartofLegal Studiesen_US
dc.subjecttorten_US
dc.subjectvicarious liabilityen_US
dc.subjectorganisationsen_US
dc.titleModelling Organisational Vicarious Liabilityen_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/lst.2019.10en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusAccepteden_US
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-03-15en_US
rioxxterms.funderDefault funderen_US
rioxxterms.identifier.projectDefault projecten_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record