Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGARI, Gen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-06T12:15:38Z
dc.date.available2017-05-29en_US
dc.date.submitted2017-06-06T19:22:55.772Z
dc.identifier.issn1742-3945en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/32052
dc.description.abstractThe UK can’t have it all. Its proposal to maintain a deeply integrated trade and economic relationship with the EU alongside its rejection of the key obligations, institutions and enforcement mechanisms necessary for securing such degree of economic integration is inherently contradictory. If there is one thing certain about the final outcome of the negotiations for a post Brexit UK-EU trade agreement, is that the degree of market access that it will deliver will be lower than the current one. Against this background, this paper explores how the parties can use their treaty-making capacity wisely, taking advantage of the proximity, long-standing common values and European identity shared by them in order to design a second-best alternative that meets UK demands and, at the same time, is capable of delivering a degree of economic integration as closest as possible to current levels.en_US
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElectronicpublications.org Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofManchester Journal of International Economic Lawen_US
dc.subjectBrexiten_US
dc.subjectTrade agreementen_US
dc.titleThe negotiation of a UK-EU trade agreement: objective, process and possible outcomesen_US
dc.typeArticle
pubs.issue2en_US
pubs.notes6 monthsen_US
pubs.publication-statusAccepteden_US
pubs.publisher-urlhttps://www.electronicpublications.org/catalogue.php?id=48en_US
pubs.volume14en_US
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-05-29en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record