Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBANDYOPADHYAY, Sen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-13T14:59:26Z
dc.date.available2017-07-11en_US
dc.date.issued2018-01-01en_US
dc.date.submitted2017-10-09T09:55:13.803Z
dc.identifier.issn0165-1765en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/28671
dc.description.abstractI compare time series properties of relative and absolute Ginis to examine which one is better suited for time dependent analyses. In particular, I model Gini trends as a fractionally integrated process and find that there are more mean-reverting absolute Ginis than relative Ginis suggesting that absolute Ginis may be better suited than relative Ginis for time-dependent analyses. I then undertake an estimation of the inequality-growth relationship using popular panel regression methods and find that the absolute Gini is negatively and significantly associated with growth for most models estimated, but none for the relative Gini. I deduce that from an empirical point of view, the absolute Gini may be a better choice when undertaking time dependent analyses.en_US
dc.format.extent135 - 139en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.ispartofEconomics Lettersen_US
dc.titleThe Absolute Gini is a More Reliable Measure of Inequality for Time Dependent Analyses (compared with the Relative Gini)en_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.holder© 2017 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.econlet.2017.07.012en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden_US
pubs.publisher-urlhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2017.07.012en_US
pubs.volume162en_US
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-07-11en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record