Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMurawski, Men_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-06T11:26:02Z
dc.date.available2017-03-07en_US
dc.date.issued2017-03-07en_US
dc.date.submitted2017-06-02T10:52:39.448Z
dc.identifier.issn0952-8822en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/23569
dc.descriptionpeerreview_statement: The publishing and review policy for this title is described in its Aims & Scope. aims_and_scope_url: http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?show=aimsScope&journalCode=ctte20
dc.descriptionpeerreview_statement: The publishing and review policy for this title is described in its Aims & Scope. aims_and_scope_url: http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?show=aimsScope&journalCode=ctte20en_US
dc.descriptionpeerreview_statement: The publishing and review policy for this title is described in its Aims & Scope. aims_and_scope_url: http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?show=aimsScope&journalCode=ctte20en_US
dc.descriptionpeerreview_statement: The publishing and review policy for this title is described in its Aims & Scope. aims_and_scope_url: http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?show=aimsScope&journalCode=ctte20en_US
dc.description.abstractThis text compares and contrasts two monumental architectural ensembles: Walter Sisulu Square of Dedication in Kliptown, Johannesburg, opened in 2005 by President Thabo Mbeki; and The Palace of Culture and Science, a Stalinist skyscraper ‘gifted’ to Warsaw by the Soviet Union in 1955. This architectural juxtaposition serves as the point of departure for the text’s two, interconnected key themes: an inquiry into the complex continuities and contradictions between the political and economic reconfigurations experienced by South Africa after 1994 and Poland after 1989; and an exploration into what the author defines as the ‘political morphology’ of monumental architecture. The bulk of the text is concerned with a critical investigation into how scholars conceive of the relationship between the morphological (spatial, geometric and aesthetic) characteristics of built form, and their political or economic correlates. Must there be – as the scholarly consensus suggests – an intrinsic connection between democracy and architectural humility, and between authoritarianism and monumentality?en_US
dc.format.extent1 - 17en_US
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherInforma UKen_US
dc.relation.ispartofThird Texten_US
dc.rightsCC-BY
dc.subjectWarsawen_US
dc.subjectJohannesburgen_US
dc.subjectArchitectural juxstapositionen_US
dc.subjectMonumentalityen_US
dc.titleRadical Centres: The Political Morphology of Monumentality in Warsaw and Johannesburgen_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.holder© 2017 The Author(s)
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/09528822.2016.1275188en_US
pubs.notesNo embargoen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden_US
pubs.publisher-urlhttp://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/09528822.2016.1275188en_US
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-03-07en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record