Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHUNTER, RCen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-03T15:34:18Z
dc.date.available2017-03-10en_US
dc.date.submitted2017-03-21T14:27:47.980Z
dc.identifier.issn0141-8033en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/22375
dc.description.abstractThis article discusses the ‘unintended’, but by no means unpredicted, consequences of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO) in terms of the drop in family mediation, the various efforts which have been made subsequently to promote it and what we know about how they are working. It places these developments within the context of earlier efforts to promote mediation, and argues that ongoing attempts to induce demand for mediation among divorcing and separating couples face continuing intransigence in the ‘market’ for post-separation services, such that a different approach may be called for.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Social Welfare and Family Lawen_US
dc.subjectfamily mediationen_US
dc.subjectLASPOen_US
dc.subjectlegal aiden_US
dc.titleInducing demand for family mediation - before and after LASPOen_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.holder© 2017 Routledge
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/09649069.2017.1306346en_US
pubs.notes12 monthsen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublished onlineen_US
pubs.volume39en_US
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-03-10en_US
qmul.funderMapping Paths to Family Justice::ESRCen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record