| dc.contributor.author | Ingleby, M | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-01-04T16:26:44Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2013 | en_US |
| dc.date.submitted | 2016-10-10T12:48:53.084Z | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/18351 | |
| dc.format.extent | 97 - 113 | en_US |
| dc.language | en | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Project Muse | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Victorian Review | en_US |
| dc.title | Chemistry versus Biology: Dickens, Malthus, and the Familiarized Doppelgänger | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | |
| dc.rights.holder | (c) 2013 The John Hopkins University | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1353/vcr.2013.0051 | en_US |
| pubs.issue | 2 | en_US |
| pubs.notes | Not known | en_US |
| pubs.notes | Although the date that appears on the journal is Fall 2013, Lisa Surridge, Victorian Review's editor, can confirm (in writing) that the issue actually appeared a year late, in Fall 2014, therefore fitting within the current REF period. | en_US |
| pubs.publication-status | Published | en_US |
| pubs.volume | 39 | en_US |
