• Login
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
    Numerical modelling of Glacial Lake Outburst Floods using physically based dam-breach models 
    •   QMRO Home
    • School of Geography
    • The Centre for Aquatic and Terrestrial Environments
    • Numerical modelling of Glacial Lake Outburst Floods using physically based dam-breach models
    •   QMRO Home
    • School of Geography
    • The Centre for Aquatic and Terrestrial Environments
    • Numerical modelling of Glacial Lake Outburst Floods using physically based dam-breach models
    ‌
    ‌

    Browse

    All of QMROCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects
    ‌
    ‌

    Administrators only

    Login
    ‌
    ‌

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Numerical modelling of Glacial Lake Outburst Floods using physically based dam-breach models

    Volume
    2
    Pagination
    477 - 533
    Publisher
    Copernicus GmbH
    DOI
    10.5194/esurfd-2-477-2014
    Journal
    Earth Surface Dynamics Discussions
    Issue
    1
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    <jats:p>Abstract. The rapid development and instability of moraine-dammed proglacial lakes is increasing the potential for the occurrence of catastrophic Glacial Lake Outburst Floods (GLOFs) in high-mountain regions. Advanced, physically-based numerical dam-breach models represent an improvement over existing methods for the derivation of breach outflow hydrographs. However, significant uncertainty surrounds the initial parameterisation of such models, and remains largely unexplored. We use a unique combination of numerical dam-breach and two-dimensional hydrodynamic modelling, employed with a Generalised Likelihood Uncertainty Estimation (GLUE) framework to quantify the degree of equifinality in dam-breach model output for the reconstruction of the failure of Dig Tsho, Nepal. Monte Carlo analysis was used to sample the model parameter space, and morphological descriptors of the moraine breach were used to evaluate model performance. Equifinal breach morphologies were produced by parameter ensembles associated with differing breach initiation mechanisms, including overtopping waves and mechanical failure of the dam face. The material roughness coefficient was discovered to exert a dominant influence over model performance. Percentile breach hydrographs derived from cumulative distribution function hydrograph data under- or overestimated total hydrograph volume and were deemed to be inappropriate for input to hydrodynamic modelling. Our results support the use of a Total Variation Diminishing solver for outburst flood modelling, which was found to be largely free of numerical instability and flow oscillation. Routing of scenario-specific optimal breach hydrographs revealed prominent differences in the timing and extent of inundation. A GLUE-based method for constructing likelihood-weighted maps of GLOF inundation extent, flow depth, and hazard is presented, and represents an effective tool for communicating uncertainty and equifinality in GLOF hazard assessment. However, future research should focus on the utility of the approach for predictive, as opposed to reconstructive GLOF modelling. </jats:p>
    Authors
    Westoby, MJ; Brasington, J; Glasser, NF; Hambrey, MJ; Reynolds, JM; Hassan, MAAM
    URI
    http://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/15405
    Collections
    • The Centre for Aquatic and Terrestrial Environments [72]
    Language
    en
    Licence information
    CC-BY
    Copyright statements
    © 2015 Author(s)
    Twitter iconFollow QMUL on Twitter
    Twitter iconFollow QM Research
    Online on twitter
    Facebook iconLike us on Facebook
    • Site Map
    • Privacy and cookies
    • Disclaimer
    • Accessibility
    • Contacts
    • Intranet
    • Current students

    Modern Slavery Statement

    Queen Mary University of London
    Mile End Road
    London E1 4NS
    Tel: +44 (0)20 7882 5555

    © Queen Mary University of London.