Using L/E Oscillation Probability Distributions
dc.contributor.author | Aguilar-Arevalo, AA | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Brown, BC | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Bugel, L | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Cheng, G | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Church, ED | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Conrad, JM | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Dharmapalan, R | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Djurcic, Z | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Finley, DA | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Ford, R | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Garcia, FG | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Garvey, GT | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Grange, J | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Huelsnitz, W | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Ignarra, C | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Imlay, R | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Johnson, RA | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Karagiorgi, G | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Katori, T | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Kobilarcik, T | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Louis, WC | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Mariani, C | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Marsh, W | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Mills, GB | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Mirabal, J | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Moore, CD | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Mousseau, J | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Nienaber, P | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Osmanov, B | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Pavlovic, Z | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Perevalov, D | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Polly, CC | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Ray, H | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Roe, BP | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Russell, AD | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Shaevitz, MH | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Spitz, J | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Stancu, I | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Tayloe, R | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Water, RGVD | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | White, DH | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Wickremasinghe, DA | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Zeller, GP | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Zimmerman, ED | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-04-13T12:56:07Z | |
dc.date.submitted | 2016-04-01T15:41:39.500Z | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/11835 | |
dc.description.abstract | This paper explores the use of $L/E$ oscillation probability distributions to compare experimental measurements and to evaluate oscillation models. In this case, $L$ is the distance of neutrino travel and $E$ is a measure of the interacting neutrino's energy. While comparisons using allowed and excluded regions for oscillation model parameters are likely the only rigorous method for these comparisons, the $L/E$ distributions are shown to give qualitative information on the agreement of an experiment's data with a simple two-neutrino oscillation model. In more detail, this paper also outlines how the $L/E$ distributions can be best calculated and used for model comparisons. Specifically, the paper presents the $L/E$ data points for the final MiniBooNE data samples and, in the Appendix, explains and corrects the mistaken analysis published by the ICARUS collaboration. | en_US |
dc.rights | arXiv record: http://arxiv.org/abs/1407.3304 | |
dc.subject | hep-ex | en_US |
dc.subject | hep-ex | en_US |
dc.subject | hep-ph | en_US |
dc.subject | nucl-ex | en_US |
dc.title | Using L/E Oscillation Probability Distributions | en_US |
dc.type | Article | |
pubs.author-url | http://arxiv.org/abs/1407.3304v1 | en_US |
pubs.notes | Not known | en_US |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
Physics and Astronomy [1329]