The Fragility Fracture Postoperative Mobilisation multicentre audit : the reality of weightbearing practices following operations for lower limb fragility fractures.
View/ Open
Volume
104-B
Pagination
972 - 979
DOI
10.1302/0301-620X.104B8.BJJ-2022-0074.R1
Journal
Bone Joint J
Issue
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
AIMS: The purpose of this study was to determine the weightbearing practice of operatively managed fragility fractures in the setting of publically funded health services in the UK and Ireland. METHODS: The Fragility Fracture Postoperative Mobilisation (FFPOM) multicentre audit included all patients aged 60 years and older undergoing surgery for a fragility fracture of the lower limb between 1 January 2019 and 30 June 2019, and 1 February 2021 and 14 March 2021. Fractures arising from high-energy transfer trauma, patients with multiple injuries, and those associated with metastatic deposits or infection were excluded. We analyzed this patient cohort to determine adherence to the British Orthopaedic Association Standard, "all surgery in the frail patient should be performed to allow full weight-bearing for activities required for daily living". RESULTS: A total of 19,557 patients (mean age 82 years (SD 9), 16,241 having a hip fracture) were included. Overall, 16,614 patients (85.0%) were instructed to perform weightbearing where required for daily living immediately postoperatively (15,543 (95.7%) hip fracture and 1,071 (32.3%) non-hip fracture patients). The median length of stay was 12.2 days (interquartile range (IQR) 7.9 to 20.0) (12.6 days (IQR 8.2 to 20.4) for hip fracture and 10.3 days (IQR 5.5 to 18.7) for non-hip fracture patients). CONCLUSION: Non-hip fracture patients experienced more postoperative weightbearing restrictions, although they had a shorter hospital stay. Patients sustaining fractures of the shaft and distal femur had a longer median length of stay than demographically similar patients who received hip fracture surgery. We have shown a significant disparity in weightbearing restrictions placed on patients with fragility fractures, despite the publication of a national guideline. Surgeons intentionally restrict postoperative weightbearing in the majority of non-hip fractures, yet are content with unrestricted weightbearing following operations for hip fractures. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(8):972-979.
Authors
Richardson, C; Bretherton, CP; Raza, M; Zargaran, A; Eardley, WGP; Trompeter, AJ; FFPOM CollaboratorsCollections
Language
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Assessing fracture risk in people with MS: a service development study comparing three fracture risk scoring systems
Dobson, R; Leddy, SG; Gangadharan, S; Giovannoni, G (BMJ Publishing Group Ltd, 2013-03-11)Objectives Suboptimal bone health is increasingly recognised as an important cause of morbidity. Multiple sclerosis (MS) has been consistently associated with an increased risk of osteoporosis and fracture. Various fracture ... -
Ultrahigh Recovery of Fracture Strength on Mismatched Fractured Amorphous Surfaces of Silicon Carbide
Cui, J; Zhang, Z; Jiang, H; Liu, D; Zou, L; Guo, X; Lu, Y; Parkin, IP; Guo, D (2019-07) -
Intramedullary nails versus distal locking plates for fracture of the distal femur: results from the Trial of Acute Femoral Fracture Fixation (TrAFFix) randomised feasibility study and process evaluation.
Griffin, XL; Costa, ML; Phelps, E; Parsons, N; Dritsaki, M; Achten, J; Tutton, E; Lerner, RG; McGibbon, A; Baird, J (BMJ Publishing Group, 2019-05-05)Objectives This feasibility study and process evaluation assessed the likely success of a definitive trial of intramedullary fixation with locked retrograde nails versus extramedullary fixation with fixed angle plates for ...