• Login
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
    [Evaluation of psychiatric treatment by patients--results and problems of systematic research]. 
    •   QMRO Home
    • Blizard Institute
    • Centre for Primary Care and Public Health
    • [Evaluation of psychiatric treatment by patients--results and problems of systematic research].
    •   QMRO Home
    • Blizard Institute
    • Centre for Primary Care and Public Health
    • [Evaluation of psychiatric treatment by patients--results and problems of systematic research].
    ‌
    ‌

    Browse

    All of QMROCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects
    ‌
    ‌

    Administrators only

    Login
    ‌
    ‌

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    [Evaluation of psychiatric treatment by patients--results and problems of systematic research].

    View/Open
    Published Version
    Embargoed until: 2100-01-01
    Reason: VoR
    Volume
    21
    Pagination
    88 - 95
    Journal
    Psychiatr Prax
    Issue
    3
    ISSN
    0303-4259
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    In the last three decades there has been a growing scientific interest in users' assessment of psychiatric services and treatment. The "consumer satisfaction" research found that the majority of users show a high level of global satisfaction with the treatment they are receiving. Controlled and randomized studies in different treatment settings showed that users are significantly more satisfied with partial hospitalization and community care than with standard hospital care. Only a few consistent associations were found between sociodemographic data, clinical history and assessment of treatment, while a higher degree of chopathological symptoms was always correlated with a more negative assessment of treatment. Users' assessment of treatment is not only important as an outcome criterion of treatment but can also influence the therapeutic process itself and predict outcome. The interpretation of the findings is limited by several methodological and conceptual problems. The shortcomings and the relevance of users' assessment, e.g. in regard to improvement of psychiatric care are discussed.
    Authors
    Gruyters, T; Priebe, S
    URI
    http://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/919
    Collections
    • Centre for Primary Care and Public Health [1477]
    Language
    ger
    Copyright statements
    © Psychiatr Prax 1994
    Twitter iconFollow QMUL on Twitter
    Twitter iconFollow QM Research
    Online on twitter
    Facebook iconLike us on Facebook
    • Site Map
    • Privacy and cookies
    • Disclaimer
    • Accessibility
    • Contacts
    • Intranet
    • Current students

    Modern Slavery Statement

    Queen Mary University of London
    Mile End Road
    London E1 4NS
    Tel: +44 (0)20 7882 5555

    © Queen Mary University of London.