Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEzejiofor, Obianuju Chioma
dc.identifier.citationEzejiofor, O.J. 2014. Domestic courts and international investment arbitral tribunals: nurturing a profitable and symbiotic relationship. Queen Mary University of London.en_US
dc.description.abstractThis thesis proposes that conscious and increased co-operation and coordination of the relationship between investment tribunals and domestic courts can greatly improve the efficacy of the international investment arbitration system, and further the rule of law. The extent of the power both forums wield, the level of influence both systems have on each other and the critical roles both systems play in the resolution of investment disputes warrant a systematic approach to cooperation and coordination. This study finds justification for this proposition by analyzing the policy implications of investment arbitration outcomes. It goes on to explore the relationship between domestic courts and investment tribunals by examining the roles they play and the areas of jurisdictional friction between the two systems. The core issues addressed include the jurisdiction and competence of international investment tribunals and domestic courts in the resolution of investment disputes; the support roles of domestic courts; anti-suit/anti-arbitration injunctions; pre-conditions to arbitration; the effects and implications of the review of investment tribunals’ decisions by domestic courts, and the review of the lawfulness of the conduct of domestic judicial systems by investment arbitration tribunals. In addressing these issues, the work examines the extent to which domestic courts and international arbitration tribunals should accord deference to each other with respect to their involvement in the resolution of investment disputes. Based on the analysis of the areas of intersection between the domestic and international investment dispute settlement systems, instances of ‘positive interactions’ are highlighted and encouraged. The study also proposes ways in which further cooperation and coordination can take place. In making these proposals, and acknowledging the differences that exist, this thesis considers the collaboration between other international adjudicatory bodies and domestic courts so as to distill lessons for the international investment arbitration systemen_US
dc.publisherQueen Mary University of Londonen_US
dc.subjectInvestment tribunalsen_US
dc.subjectInternational investment arbitrationen_US
dc.subjectCommercial lawen_US
dc.titleDomestic courts and international investment arbitral tribunals: nurturing a profitable and symbiotic relationship.en_US
dc.rights.holderThe copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without the prior written consent of the author

Files in this item


There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Theses [3827]
    Theses Awarded by Queen Mary University of London

Show simple item record