Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSabbadini, Lorenzo
dc.date.accessioned2015-09-15T10:56:08Z
dc.date.available2015-09-15T10:56:08Z
dc.date.issued2013-11
dc.identifier.citationSabbadini, L. 2013. Property, Liberty and Self-Ownership in the English Revolution. Queen Mary University of London.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/jspui/handle/123456789/8678
dc.descriptionPhDen_US
dc.description.abstractThis thesis seeks to develop our understanding of ideas about political liberty in the English Revolution by way of focusing on the issue of property, a topic unduly neglected in the secondary literature. Most writers of the period conceived of liberty as absence of dependence, but what has been little examined is the extent to which it was believed that the attainment of this condition required not only a particular kind of constitution but a particular distribution of property as well. Here the central ideal became that of self-ownership, and the thesis is largely devoted to tracing the rise, eclipse and re-emergence of this way of thinking about the connections between property and liberty. Chapter 1 considers the emergence, in the ‘paper war’ of the early 1640s, of the radical Parliamentarian view that all property ultimately resided in Parliament. It was to oppose this stance, Chapter 2 argues, that the Levellers began to speak of ‘selfe propriety’, transforming the Parliamentarian notion of popular sovereignty into an individualist doctrine designed to protect subjects and their property from not only the king but also Parliament. Elements of both the Parliamentarian and Leveller discussions of property were taken up by John Milton and Marchamont Nedham (Chapter 3), while James Harrington offered an alternative theory that eschewed the notion of self-ownership (Chapter 4). After a chapter considering the relationship between property and freedom in Henry Neville and Algernon Sidney, the final chapter focuses on John Locke’s revival of self-ownership in his attempt to ground property rights in the individual’s ownership of his ‘person’. Although Locke is shown to offer a theory of private property, the Locke that emerges is not a proto-liberal defender of individual rights but a theorist of neo-Roman freedom whose aim was to explain the connection between property and non-dependence.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipArts and Humanities Research Council; Newberry Consortiumen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherQueen Mary University of Londonen_US
dc.subjectHistoryen_US
dc.subjectEngland 17th centuryen_US
dc.subjectLevellersen_US
dc.subjectProperty England 17th centuryen_US
dc.subjectPolitical freedom England 17th centuryen_US
dc.titleProperty, Liberty and Self-Ownership in the English Revolution.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.rights.holderThe copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without the prior written consent of the author


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Return to top