dc.contributor.author | Rippon, Matthew James Julian | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-09-14T15:26:29Z | |
dc.date.available | 2015-09-14T15:26:29Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Rippon, M.J.J. 2013. Indications of Geography? Constructions of Place, Boundaries, and Authenticity in the UK Protected Food Names System. Queen Mary University of London. | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/8636 | |
dc.description.abstract | Geographers have investigated agri-foods, commodity chains, 'alternative' food
networks, 'local' production, and multicultural cuisine. However, the relationship
between food, place, boundaries, environmental determinism, and authenticity
remains under-researched. This thesis seeks to redress this deficiency with a detailed
study of the construction of the Protected Food Names (PFN) scheme in the UK. PFNs
are a type of Intellectual Property (IP) and form the European component of the
international Geographical Indications (GI) system. These place-based foods and
drinks originate from defined and bounded areas and are produced in supposedly
traditional ways. Their manufacturers consider them unreplicable outside the
protected zone.
This qualitative investigation of three PFNs – Melton Mowbray Pork Pies,
Stilton Cheese, and Grimsby Traditional Smoked Fish – critiques the ways in which
ideas of place, boundaries, and authenticity are invoked by producers. The thesis
interrogates how manufacturers understand place and its boundedness, employ
supposedly 'objective' historical evidence, and apply the ambiguous notion of
authenticity to stabilise and sustain local practices. The study also examines the
strategies deployed to generate consumer interest in an era where uniqueness is an
important marker of value.
This work thus introduces a different conceptual angle to accounts of the PFN
structure which primarily privilege legal or economistic assessments. It aims instead to
deconstruct the geographical concepts on which the PFN edifice is based. The ultimate
aim is to draw attention to the vagaries inherent in the increasingly hegemonic GI
model. This research connects with geographical debates about the construction of
place and boundaries, the social production of authenticity, the role of selective
historical 'facts' in the development of narratives about place, and the 'selling' of
location and its products. It therefore provides a lens through which the foundations
and everyday operation of the GI system can be profitably analysed. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | Economic and Social Research
Council (ESRC); Institute for Humane Studies
(IHS). | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Queen Mary University of London | |
dc.subject | Geography | en_US |
dc.subject | Spain | en_US |
dc.subject | Social movements | en_US |
dc.subject | Cities | en_US |
dc.subject | Political movements | en_US |
dc.subject | Right of assembly | en_US |
dc.title | Indications of Geography? Constructions of Place, Boundaries, and Authenticity in the UK Protected Food Names System.. | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
dc.rights.holder | The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without the prior written consent of the author | |