Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLertdhamtewe, Pawarit
dc.date.accessioned2015-09-08T14:43:57Z
dc.date.available2015-09-08T14:43:57Z
dc.date.issued2014-09-30
dc.identifier.citationLertdhamtewe, P. 2014. The Reformation of Legal Regime for Intellectual Property Protection of Plant Varieties in Thailand. Queen Mary University of Londonen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/8543
dc.descriptionPhDen_US
dc.description.abstractThailand’s plant protection regime presents a unique sui generis plant protection system, which is used as a model by several developing nations. The current Thai Plant Variety Protection (PVP) law has attracted some criticism, and whether or not farmers and breeders actually benefit from the system is in doubt. The questions this situation raises are: has Thailand adopted clear, coherent, and workable rules for plant variety protection in response to the needs of the nation? Is the introduction of intellectual property rights (IPRs) in agriculture via a PVP regime a desirable and contributory factor to the development of Thailand? More precisely, how might such an IPR regime be made compatible with Thailand’s development needs, bearing in mind the obligations the country has accepted through its membership of the WTO and adherence to the TRIPS Agreement? This thesis attempts to address these questions. By highlighting the salient features of the Thai plant protection regime, this thesis addresses the major concerns of the rights of farmers, local communities, and plant breeders. It is suggested that the protection of plant varieties is vital to Thailand, considering the fact that agriculture represents a fundamental economic activity and the livelihood of a large section of the total population; therefore, introducing IPRs in agriculture via the PVP regime is critical to the development of agriculture in Thailand. Thus, a new developmental approach to the IP protection of plant varieties is desirable to ensure the unique needs of the nation the validity of national legislation, and the long-term promotion of agricultural development and sustainability in Thailand. Thailand can provide a more coherent framework for plant variety protection by carefully calibrating the PVP provisions and establishing a coherent set of rules in the form of a new legislative framework. It is concluded that a number of possible elements are available from a variety of instruments that exist in international law, notably the TRIPS Agreement, the UPOV Convention, the CBD, and the ITPGRFA. Lastly, the proposed regulatory reforms suggest that Thailand’s PVP provisions should be amended in three major areas, including (1) provisions for the rights of farmers and local societies, (2) legal protection for plant breeders’ rights, and (3) institutional apparatus governing plant protection issues in Thailand.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipHerchel Smith Funding Board, and the Faculty of Law, Chiang Mai University, Thailanen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherQueen Mary University of Londonen_US
dc.subjectLawen_US
dc.subjectIntellectual propertyen_US
dc.subjectPlant Variety Protectionen_US
dc.subjectThailanden_US
dc.titleThe Reformation of Legal Regime for Intellectual Property Protection of Plant Varieties in Thailanden_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.rights.holderThe copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without the prior written consent of the author


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Theses [2752]
    Theses Awarded by Queen Mary University of London

Show simple item record