• Login
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
    Documenting hurt: UN, epistemic injustice, and the political ecology of the 2010 cholera epidemic in Haiti 
    •   QMRO Home
    • School of Languages, Linguistics and Film
    • Comparative Literature and Culture
    • Documenting hurt: UN, epistemic injustice, and the political ecology of the 2010 cholera epidemic in Haiti
    •   QMRO Home
    • School of Languages, Linguistics and Film
    • Comparative Literature and Culture
    • Documenting hurt: UN, epistemic injustice, and the political ecology of the 2010 cholera epidemic in Haiti
    ‌
    ‌

    Browse

    All of QMROCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects
    ‌
    ‌

    Administrators only

    Login
    ‌
    ‌

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Documenting hurt: UN, epistemic injustice, and the political ecology of the 2010 cholera epidemic in Haiti

    View/Open
    Published version
    Embargoed until: 5555-01-01
    Reason: Version not permitted.
    Accepted version (72.54Kb)
    Volume
    29
    Pagination
    209 - 226
    DOI
    10.1080/09639489.2020.1810646
    Journal
    Modern and Contemporary France
    Issue
    2
    ISSN
    0963-9489
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    In a reiteration of a long history of pathologization of Haiti and Haitians, the cholera epidemic was framed as endemic, an inevitable outcome of the 2010 earthquake, and a quasi-confirmation of Haiti’s premodern, exceptional predicament. Baseball in the Time of Cholera and Haiti in a Time of Cholera, widely viewed but not extensively analysed documentaries, challenge this linking of disaster and disease. They reveal forms of epistemic injustice and counter the politics behind such misappropriations of cause and effect in the UN-introduced cholera outbreak. Centring on the notion of hurt, this essay explores the ways in which the two films give value to personal testimony, stories of individual life and loss, offer a relational take on life with cholera, and, in so doing, contribute to the ‘narrative defeat’ of the UN (Payton 2017). In effect, the two films, as the article argues, formulate a political ecology of the epidemic: they compel a rethinking of the relationship between forms of experiential knowledge, such as personal testimony, and forms of slow violence that occur when an environment is rendered dangerous, or when an introduced disease becomes an endemic threat.
    Authors
    Mika, K
    URI
    https://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/73758
    Collections
    • Comparative Literature and Culture [101]
    Twitter iconFollow QMUL on Twitter
    Twitter iconFollow QM Research
    Online on twitter
    Facebook iconLike us on Facebook
    • Site Map
    • Privacy and cookies
    • Disclaimer
    • Accessibility
    • Contacts
    • Intranet
    • Current students

    Modern Slavery Statement

    Queen Mary University of London
    Mile End Road
    London E1 4NS
    Tel: +44 (0)20 7882 5555

    © Queen Mary University of London.