Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorChaichanavichkij, Pen_US
dc.contributor.authorVollebregt, PFen_US
dc.contributor.authorTee, SZYen_US
dc.contributor.authorScott, SMen_US
dc.contributor.authorKnowles, CHen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-09T14:47:37Z
dc.date.available2021-04-26en_US
dc.date.issued2021-05-07en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/72447
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Colectomy remains a treatment option for a minority of patients with slow-transit constipation (STC) refractory to conservative treatment. However careful patient selection is essential to maximize benefits and minimize risk of adverse outcome. This study determined the proportion of patients with chronic constipation that would meet criteria for colectomy based on recent European graded practice recommendations derived by expert consensus. METHODS: Retrospective application of graded practice recommendations was undertaken on a prospectively maintained data set of consecutive adult patients with chronic constipation who underwent whole-gut transit studies using radio-opaque markers. Primary analysis applied contraindications achieving high level of expert consensus (normal whole-gut transit as an absolute contraindication and faecal incontinence as a relative contraindication for colectomy). Secondary analysis applied contraindications with less certain consensus. RESULTS: Primary analysis of 1568 patients undergoing a whole-gut transit study between January 2004 and March 2016 found 208 (13.3 per cent) met published criteria to be selected for colectomy, with 974 excluded for normal whole-gut transit and 386 for faecal incontinence. Secondary analysis demonstrated high prevalence of other relative contraindications to colectomy: 165 concomitant upper gastrointestinal symptoms, 216 abdominal pain (including 126 irritable bowel syndrome), and 446 evacuation disorder. The majority of patients (416 of 594) had two or more relative contraindications. If these patients were excluded, only 26 (1.7 per cent) chronically constipated patients retrospectively met selection criteria for colectomy. CONCLUSIONS: The retrospective application of selection criteria is a limitation. However, the data highlight the high prevalence of factors associated with poor postoperative outcome and provide further caution to surgeons undertaking colectomy for STC.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofBJS Openen_US
dc.rightsThis is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
dc.titleSlow-transit constipation and criteria for colectomy: a cross-sectional study of 1568 patients.en_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.holder© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Society Ltd.
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/bjsopen/zrab049en_US
pubs.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34052848en_US
pubs.issue3en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden_US
pubs.volume5en_US
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-04-26en_US
rioxxterms.funderDefault funderen_US
rioxxterms.identifier.projectDefault projecten_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record