Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAstley, Sen_US
dc.contributor.authorHarkness, Een_US
dc.contributor.authorSergeant, Jen_US
dc.contributor.authorStavrinos, Pen_US
dc.contributor.authorWarren, Ren_US
dc.contributor.authorWilson, Men_US
dc.contributor.authorBrentnall, Aen_US
dc.contributor.authorCuzick, Jen_US
dc.contributor.authorHowell, Aen_US
dc.contributor.authorEvans, Gen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-19T14:18:35Z
dc.date.issued2016-07-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn0959-8049en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/66429
dc.format.extents6 - ?en_US
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Journal of Canceren_US
dc.title13 Proffered Paper: A comparison of four methods of mammographic density measurement in the UK Predicting Risk Of Cancer At Screening (PROCAS) study – on behalf of the PROCAS Study teamen_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/s0959-8049(16)61013-4en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.volume61en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record