Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTaylor, JLM
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-09T12:20:16Z
dc.date.available2020-06-09T12:20:16Z
dc.date.issued2020-02-01
dc.identifier.urihttps://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/64746
dc.description.abstractIn XX v Whittington Hospital NHS Trust [2018] EWCA Civ 2832, the Court of Appeal recognised commercial surrogacy in California as a permissible head of damage in a case of negligently inflicted infertility. Due to changing public policies and judicial opinion regarding the practice, and by incorporating the three-part test of illegality developed for civil claims by the Supreme Court in Patel v Mirza [2016] UKSC 42 into tort law, the Court of Appeal held that the principle of restorative justice required a departure from the precedent established in Briody v St Helens and Knowsley AHA [2001] EWCA Civ 1010.en_US
dc.format.extent197 - 207
dc.languageeng
dc.relation.ispartofMed Law Rev
dc.subjectDamagesen_US
dc.subjectIllegalityen_US
dc.subjectInfertilityen_US
dc.subjectMedical negligenceen_US
dc.subjectSurrogacyen_US
dc.subjectTorten_US
dc.titleInternational Commercial Surrogacy as a New Head of Tortious Damage: XX v Whittington Hospital NHS Trust [2018] EWCA Civ 2832.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/medlaw/fwz043
pubs.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31898743en_US
pubs.issue1en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden_US
pubs.volume28en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record