Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPiquet, Aen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-04T09:14:15Z
dc.date.issued2020-03-27en_US
dc.identifier.issn1623-6297en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/64640
dc.description.abstract© L'Harmattan Created by a convention signed in 1995, Europol has since been the object of substantial organisational and operational mutations. Nevertheless, Europol is still far away from being a supranational European police. Thus, the sui generis governance of this EU agency, granting a major role to national governments, and its limited powers seem to comply with the idea of an integration paradox, highlighted by new intergovernmentalism. By analysing these Europol's evolutions through the sociology of public action, this article offers to nuance and even to question some of the neo-intergovernmentalist premises. To this end, this article aims at underlining the diversity of actors, the plurality of their representations and interactions in the EU decision-making, underestimated by these works whose main goal is the theorisation of the European integration.en_US
dc.format.extent62 - 89en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofPolitique Europeenneen_US
dc.titleEuropol's institutional trajectory. Hybridization confirming a paradox of integration?en_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.doi10.3917/poeu.065.0062en_US
pubs.issue3en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden_US
pubs.volume65en_US
rioxxterms.funderDefault funderen_US
rioxxterms.identifier.projectDefault projecten_US
rioxxterms.funder.project483cf8e1-88a1-4b8b-aecb-8402672d45f8en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record