• Login
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
    Assessing non-linear models for galaxy clustering II: model validation and forecasts for Stage IV surveys 
    •   QMRO Home
    • School of Physics and Astronomy
    • Physics and Astronomy
    • Assessing non-linear models for galaxy clustering II: model validation and forecasts for Stage IV surveys
    •   QMRO Home
    • School of Physics and Astronomy
    • Physics and Astronomy
    • Assessing non-linear models for galaxy clustering II: model validation and forecasts for Stage IV surveys
    ‌
    ‌

    Browse

    All of QMROCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects
    ‌
    ‌

    Administrators only

    Login
    ‌
    ‌

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Assessing non-linear models for galaxy clustering II: model validation and forecasts for Stage IV surveys

    View/Open
    Accepted version (3.994Mb)
    Publisher
    Oxford University Press (OUP)
    DOI
    10.1093/mnras/staa502
    Journal
    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
    ISSN
    0035-8711
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Accurate modelling of non-linear scales in galaxy clustering will be crucial for data analysis of Stage IV galaxy surveys. A selection of competing non-linear models must be made based on validation studies. We provide a comprehensive set of forecasts of two different models for the halo redshift space power spectrum, namely the commonly applied TNS model and an effective field theory of large scale structure (EFTofLSS) inspired model. Using simulation data and a least-χ2 analysis, we determine ranges of validity for the models. We then conduct an exploratory Fisher analysis using the full anisotropic power spectrum to investigate parameter degeneracies. We proceed to perform an MCMC analysis utilising the monopole, quadrupole, and hexadecapole spectra, with a restricted range of scales for the latter in order to avoid biasing our growth rate, f, constraint. We find that the TNS model with a Lorentzian damping and standard Eulerian perturbative modelling outperforms other variants of the TNS model. Our MCMC analysis finds that the EFTofLSS-based model may provide tighter marginalised constraints on f at z = 0.5 and z = 1 than the TNS model, despite having additional nuisance parameters. However this depends on the range of scales used as well as the fiducial values and priors on the EFT nuisance parameters. Finally, we extend previous work to provide a consistent comparison between the Fisher matrix and MCMC forecasts using the multipole expansion formalism, and find good agreement between them.
    Authors
    Bose, B; Pourtsidou, A; Markovič, K; Beutler, F
    URI
    https://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/63199
    Collections
    • Physics and Astronomy [1216]
    Language
    en
    Licence information
    This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society following peer review. The version of record is available https://academic.oup.com/mnras/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/mnras/staa502/5740729?redirectedFrom=fulltext
    Copyright statements
    © 2020 The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society
    Twitter iconFollow QMUL on Twitter
    Twitter iconFollow QM Research
    Online on twitter
    Facebook iconLike us on Facebook
    • Site Map
    • Privacy and cookies
    • Disclaimer
    • Accessibility
    • Contacts
    • Intranet
    • Current students

    Modern Slavery Statement

    Queen Mary University of London
    Mile End Road
    London E1 4NS
    Tel: +44 (0)20 7882 5555

    © Queen Mary University of London.