Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKillaspy, Hen_US
dc.contributor.authorPriebe, Sen_US
dc.contributor.authorMcPherson, Pen_US
dc.contributor.authorZenasni, Zen_US
dc.contributor.authorMcCrone, Pen_US
dc.contributor.authorDowling, Sen_US
dc.contributor.authorHarrison, Ien_US
dc.contributor.authorKrotofil, Jen_US
dc.contributor.authorDalton-Locke, Cen_US
dc.contributor.authorMcGranahan, Ren_US
dc.contributor.authorArbuthnott, Men_US
dc.contributor.authorCurtis, Sen_US
dc.contributor.authorLeavey, Gen_US
dc.contributor.authorMacPherson, Ren_US
dc.contributor.authorEldridge, Sen_US
dc.contributor.authorKing, Men_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-08T10:38:42Z
dc.date.available2019-04-05en_US
dc.date.issued2019en_US
dc.identifier.issn1664-0640en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/58922
dc.description.abstractBackground: Mental health supported accommodation services are implemented across England, usually organised into a 'step-down' care pathway that requires the individual to repeatedly move as they gain skills and confidence for more independent living. There have been no trials comparing the effectiveness of different types of supported accommodation, but two widely used models (supported housing and floating outreach) have been found to provide similar support. We aimed to assess the feasibility of conducting a large-scale trial comparing these two models. Methods: Individually randomised, parallel group feasibility trial in three regions of England (North London, East London, and Cheltenham and Gloucestershire). We aimed to recruit 60 participants in 15 months, referred to supported accommodation, randomly allocated on an equal basis to receive either a local supported housing or floating outreach service. We assessed referrals to the trial, participants recruited, attrition, time from recruitment to moving into either type of supported accommodation, and feasibility of masking. We conducted a process evaluation to examine our results further. Results: We screened 1,432 potential participants, of whom 17 consented to participate, with 8 agreeing to randomisation (of whom 1 was lost to attrition) and 9 participating in naturalistic follow-up. Our process evaluation indicated that the main obstacle to recruitment was staff and service user preferences for certain types of supported accommodation or for specific services. Staff also felt that randomisation compromised their professional judgement. Conclusions: Our results do not support investment in a large-scale trial in England at this time. Trial registration: UK CRN Portfolio database, Trial ID: ISRCTN19689576. Trial funding: National Institute of Health Research (RP-PG-0707-10093).en_US
dc.format.extent258 - ?en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofFront Psychiatryen_US
dc.rightsThis is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
dc.subjectQuESTen_US
dc.subjectfeasibilityen_US
dc.subjectfloating outreachen_US
dc.subjectmental healthen_US
dc.subjectsupported accommodationen_US
dc.subjectsupported housingen_US
dc.subjecttrialen_US
dc.titleFeasibility Randomised Trial Comparing Two Forms of Mental Health Supported Accommodation (Supported Housing and Floating Outreach); a Component of the QuEST (Quality and Effectiveness of Supported Tenancies) Study.en_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.holder© 2019 Killaspy, Priebe, McPherson, Zenasni, McCrone, Dowling, Harrison, Krotofil, Dalton-Locke, McGranahan, Arbuthnott, Curtis, Leavey, MacPherson, Eldridge and King.
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00258en_US
pubs.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31065244en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublished onlineen_US
pubs.volume10en_US
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-04-04en_US
rioxxterms.funderDefault funderen_US
rioxxterms.identifier.projectDefault projecten_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record