Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorStaniszewska, S
dc.contributor.authorChadburn, G
dc.contributor.authorFenton, S-J
dc.contributor.authorBHUI, KS
dc.contributor.authorLarkin, M
dc.contributor.authorNewton, E
dc.contributor.authorCrepaz-Keay, D
dc.contributor.authorGriffiths, F
dc.contributor.authorWeich, S
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-25T16:08:52Z
dc.date.available2019-01-07
dc.date.available2019-03-25T16:08:52Z
dc.date.issued2019-03-21
dc.identifier.citationStaniszewska, S., Mockford, C., Chadburn, G., Fenton, S., Bhui, K., Larkin, M., . . . Weich, S. (n.d.). Experiences of in-patient mental health services: Systematic review. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 1-10. doi:10.1192/bjp.2019.22en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/56471
dc.description.abstractBackground: In-patients in crisis report poor experiences of mental healthcare not conducive to recovery. Concerns include coercion by staff, fear of assault from other patients, lack of therapeutic opportunities and limited support. There is little high-quality evidence on what is important to patients to inform recovery-focused care. Aims: To conduct a systematic review of published literature, identifying key themes for improving experiences of in-patient mental healthcare. Method: A systematic search of online databases (MEDLINE, PsycINFO and CINAHL) for primary research published between January 2000 and January 2016. All study designs from all countries were eligible. A qualitative analysis was undertaken and study quality was appraised. A patient and public reference group contributed to the review. Results: Studies (72) from 16 countries found four dimensions were consistently related to significantly influencing in-patients’ experiences of crisis and recovery-focused care: the importance of high-quality relationships; averting negative experiences of coercion; a healthy, safe and enabling physical and social environment; and authentic experiences of patient-centred care. Critical elements for patients were trust, respect, safe wards, information and explanation about clinical decisions, therapeutic activities, and family inclusion in care. Conclusions: A number of experiences hinder recovery-focused care and must be addressed with the involvement of staff to provide highquality in-patient services. Future evaluations of service quality and development of practice guidance should embed these four dimensions.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNIHR CLAHRC West Midlands
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) North Thames at Bart’s Health NHS Trust.
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherCambridge University Press (CUP)en_US
dc.relation.ispartofBritish Journal of Psychiatry
dc.subjectin-patienten_US
dc.subjectmental health servicesen_US
dc.subjectsystematic reviewen_US
dc.subjectexperiencesen_US
dc.titleExperiences of inpatient mental health services: systematic reviewen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.holder© The Royal College of Psychiatrists 2019
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2019.22
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusAccepteden_US
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-01-07
rioxxterms.funderDefault funderen_US
rioxxterms.identifier.projectDefault projecten_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record