Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGABISON, GAVen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-05T15:34:29Z
dc.date.available2017-01-15en_US
dc.date.issued2017-03-15en_US
dc.date.submitted2018-12-04T11:25:41.753Z
dc.identifier.issn0011-7188en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/55813
dc.description.abstractThis article discusses athletes' use of social media and how their parent organizations have dealt with their social media activities. This article argues that sports associations may not need to regulate athletes' use of social media. Athletes have their own private incentives: they want to maximize their financial gains and career opportunities provide stronger deterrent to post detrimental social media posts. Sports associations who punish athletes for their speech could also deter socially beneficial speeches. This article discusses how sports leagues have face antitrust challenges and how a similar antitrust challenge could potentially force leagues to revise their social media policy. It also argues that contract law limits how leagues should punish athletes for their social media activities. Finally, this article argues that policymakers have a role to play. They can encourage sports leagues - and employers in general - to adopt a clear social media policy instead of retrofitting vague and overbroad "best interest of the sports" standards.en_US
dc.format.extent31 - 60en_US
dc.relation.ispartofDePaul Journal of Sports Law & Contemporary Problemsen_US
dc.titleThe Gray Problem: Should Athletes Be Punished for Their Social Media Postsen_US
dc.typeArticle
pubs.notesNo embargoen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden_US
pubs.volume13en_US
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-01-15en_US
rioxxterms.funderDefault funderen_US
rioxxterms.identifier.projectDefault projecten_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record