Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGABISON, GAVen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-05T15:30:56Z
dc.date.available2015-01-15en_US
dc.date.issued2015-03-16en_US
dc.date.submitted2018-12-04T10:33:16.802Z
dc.identifier.issn0010-3055en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/55810
dc.description.abstractThis Article describes how different countries have approached equity crowdfunding. It focuses on countries or regulatory authorities that either expressed their awareness of the phenomenon but decided to adopt a holding pattern (monitoring and investigating) or new laws and regulations. Countries like Australia have opted to reaffirm how their current set of regulations applies to crowdfunding whereas others like the United States, Italy, the United Kingdom, and France have elected to create new exemptions in an effort to facilitate equity crowdfunding. This Article compares how each country decided to regulate the different participants in the crowdfunding process. While the results of these various efforts are still mostly unseen, this Article takes an early look at the regulatory impact using one U.K. based platform as an example of how regulations can boost investment.en_US
dc.format.extent359 - 409en_US
dc.publisherDePaul University College of Lawen_US
dc.relation.ispartofDepaul Business and Commercial Law Journalen_US
dc.titleEquity Crowdfunding: All Regulated but Not Equalen_US
dc.typeArticle
pubs.issue3en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden_US
pubs.volume13en_US
dcterms.dateAccepted2015-01-15en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record