Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGABISON, GAVen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-05T15:23:25Z
dc.date.available2017-09-30en_US
dc.date.issued2018-02-01en_US
dc.date.submitted2018-12-04T10:05:29.659Z
dc.identifier.issn1548-520Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/55807
dc.description.abstractThis paper looks at the two interpretations of non-discriminatory within fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory (FRAND) licensing terms. Nondiscriminatory has been interpreted literally to mean offering identical terms to license seekers. Non-discriminatory has also been interpreted as a commitment to guarantee access to all willing licensees. Courts in the U.S., Europe, and China have adopted one of these two interpretations or blended them. This Paper provides a comparative analysis on how U.S., European, and Chinese courts have approached non-discriminatory when patent holders guarantee to license their standard essential patent on FRAND terms. The court decisions in these three jurisdictions are used to create two spectrums to show the variations in these two interpretations. These two spectrums show some convergence over the years.en_US
dc.format.extent100 - 136 (37)en_US
dc.publisherBoston Universityen_US
dc.relation.ispartofThe Journal of Science and Technology Lawen_US
dc.titleA Two-Dimensional Approach to Non-Discriminatory Terms in FRAND Licensing Agreementsen_US
dc.typeArticle
pubs.issue1en_US
pubs.notesNo embargoen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden_US
pubs.volume24en_US
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-09-30en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record