Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor© 2017. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.contributor.authorBrissos, Sen_US
dc.contributor.authorVicente, Fen_US
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, JMen_US
dc.contributor.authorSobreira, GSen_US
dc.contributor.authorGameiro, Zen_US
dc.contributor.authorMoreira, CAen_US
dc.contributor.authorPinto da Costa, Men_US
dc.contributor.authorQueirós, Men_US
dc.contributor.authorMendes, Een_US
dc.contributor.authorRenca, Sen_US
dc.contributor.authorPrata-Ribeiro, Hen_US
dc.contributor.authorHoffmann, MSen_US
dc.contributor.authorVieira, Fen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-27T17:53:14Z
dc.date.available2017-07-31en_US
dc.date.issued2017-09en_US
dc.date.submitted2018-01-16T16:24:56.380Z
dc.identifier.otherCen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/33863
dc.descriptionpublisher: Elsevier articletitle: Compulsory psychiatric treatment checklist: Instrument development and clinical application journaltitle: International Journal of Law and Psychiatry articlelink: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2017.07.004 content_type: article copyright: © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.description.abstractInstruments designed to evaluate the necessity of compulsory psychiatric treatment (CPT) are scarce to non-existent. We developed a 25-item Checklist (scoring 0 to 50) with four clusters (Legal, Danger, Historic and Cognitive), based on variables identified as relevant to compulsory treatment. The Compulsory Treatment Checklist (CTC) was filled with information on case (n=324) and control (n=251) subjects, evaluated under the Portuguese Mental Health Act (Law 36/98), in three hospitals. For internal validation, we used Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), testing unidimensional and bifactor models. Multilevel logistic regression model (MLL) was used to predict the odds ratio (OR) for compulsory treatment based on the total scale score. Receiver Operating Characteristic analysis (ROC) was performed to predict compulsory treatment. CFA revealed the best fit indexes for the bifactor model, with all items loading on one General factor and the residual loading in the a priori predicted four specific factors. Reliability indexes were high for the General factor (88.4%), and low for specific factors (<5%), which demonstrate that CTC should not be performed in the subscales to access compulsory treatment. MLL reveals that for each item scored in the scale, it increases the OR by 1.26 for compulsory treatment (95%CI 1.21-1.31, p<0.001). Based on the total score, accuracy was 90%, and the best cut-off point of 23.5 detects compulsory treatment with a sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 93.6%. The CTC presents robust internal structure with a strong unidimensional characteristic, and a cut-off point for compulsory treatment of 23.5. The improved 20-item version of the CTC could represent an important instrument to improve clinical decision regarding CPT, and ultimately to improve mental health care of patients with severe psychiatric disorders.en_US
dc.format.extent36 - 45en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofInt J Law Psychiatryen_US
dc.subjectAdolescenten_US
dc.subjectAdulten_US
dc.subjectAgeden_US
dc.subjectAged, 80 and overen_US
dc.subjectCase-Control Studiesen_US
dc.subjectChecklisten_US
dc.subjectCognitionen_US
dc.subjectCommitment of Mentally Illen_US
dc.subjectFactor Analysis, Statisticalen_US
dc.subjectFemaleen_US
dc.subjectForensic Psychiatryen_US
dc.subjectHospitalsen_US
dc.subjectHumansen_US
dc.subjectLogistic Modelsen_US
dc.subjectMaleen_US
dc.subjectMandatory Programsen_US
dc.subjectMental Disordersen_US
dc.subjectMental Healthen_US
dc.subjectMiddle Ageden_US
dc.subjectPortugalen_US
dc.subjectPsychiatric Status Rating Scalesen_US
dc.subjectPsychometricsen_US
dc.subjectReproducibility of Resultsen_US
dc.subjectSensitivity and Specificityen_US
dc.subjectViolenceen_US
dc.subjectYoung Adulten_US
dc.titleCompulsory psychiatric treatment checklist: Instrument development and clinical application.en_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijlp.2017.07.004en_US
pubs.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28962685en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden_US
pubs.volume54en_US
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-07-31en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record