Search
Now showing items 1-10 of 17
Critical Interventions on Statebuilding
(Taylor & Francis, 2011-06-24)
Explaining Myanmar's Regime Transition: The Periphery is Central
(Taylor & Francis (Routledge), 2014-01-28)
In 2010, Myanmar (Burma) held its first elections after 22 years of direct military rule. Few compelling explanations for this regime transition have emerged. This article critiques popular accounts and potential explanations ...
Regulatory regionalism and anti-money-laundering governance in Asia
(Taylor & Francis (Routledge), 2014-11-28)
With the intensification of the Financial Action Task Force's (FATF's) worldwide campaign to promote anti-money-laundering regulation since the late 1990s, all Asian states except North Korea have signed up to its rules ...
The Political Economy of Non-Traditional Security: Explaining the Governance of Avian Influenza in Indonesia
(Palgrave Macmillan, 2015-07)
Given the common association of non-traditional security (NTS) problems with globalisation, surprisingly little attention has been paid to how the political economy context of given NTS issues shape how they are securitised ...
Probing the Links between Political Economy and Non-Traditional Security: Themes, Approaches, and Instruments
(Palgrave Macmillan, 2015-03-20)
In recent decades, the security agenda for states and international organisations has expanded dramatically to include a range of ‘non-traditional’, transnational security issues. It is often suggested that globalisation ...
Does China’s Belt and Road Initiative Challenge the Liberal, Rules-Based Order?
(Springer (part of Springer Nature), 2019-02-01)
The Political Economy of Myanmar's Transition
(2013-02-07)
Since holding elections in 2010, Myanmar has transitioned from a direct military dictatorship to a formally democratic system and has embarked on a period of rapid economic reform. After two decades of military rule, the ...
Global Governance as State Transformation
(Wiley, 2015-09-28)
Many argue today that global governance is ‘in crisis’. This reflects an undue emphasis on the fate of multilateral institutions: if they are deadlocked, global governance does not appear to be progressing. This is misplaced. ...