Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDavies, GFen_US
dc.contributor.authorGreenhough, BJen_US
dc.contributor.authorHobson-West, Pen_US
dc.contributor.authorKirk, RGWen_US
dc.contributor.authorApplebee, Ken_US
dc.contributor.authorBellingan, LCen_US
dc.contributor.authorBerdoy, Men_US
dc.contributor.authorBuller, Hen_US
dc.contributor.authorCassaday, HJen_US
dc.contributor.authorDavies, Ken_US
dc.contributor.authorDiefenbacher, Den_US
dc.contributor.authorDruglitrø, Ten_US
dc.contributor.authorEscobar, MPen_US
dc.contributor.authorFriese, Cen_US
dc.contributor.authorHerrmann, Ken_US
dc.contributor.authorHinterberger, Aen_US
dc.contributor.authorJarrett, WJen_US
dc.contributor.authorJayne, Ken_US
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, AMen_US
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, ERen_US
dc.contributor.authorKonold, Ten_US
dc.contributor.authorLeach, MCen_US
dc.contributor.authorLeonelli, Sen_US
dc.contributor.authorLewis, DIen_US
dc.contributor.authorLilley, EJen_US
dc.contributor.authorLongridge, ERen_US
dc.contributor.authorMcLeod, CMen_US
dc.contributor.authorMiele, Men_US
dc.contributor.authorNelson, NCen_US
dc.contributor.authorOrmandy, EHen_US
dc.contributor.authorPallett, Hen_US
dc.contributor.authorPoort, Len_US
dc.contributor.authorPound, Pen_US
dc.contributor.authorRamsden, Een_US
dc.contributor.authorRoe, Een_US
dc.contributor.authorScalway, Hen_US
dc.contributor.authorSchrader, Aen_US
dc.contributor.authorScotton, CJen_US
dc.contributor.authorScudamore, CLen_US
dc.contributor.authorSmith, JAen_US
dc.contributor.authorWhitfield, Len_US
dc.contributor.authorWolfensohn, Sen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-25T09:29:41Z
dc.date.available2016-06-22en_US
dc.date.issued2016en_US
dc.date.submitted2017-10-20T15:39:19.273Z
dc.identifier.urihttp://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/28345
dc.description.abstractImproving laboratory animal science and welfare requires both new scientific research and insights from research in the humanities and social sciences. Whilst scientific research provides evidence to replace, reduce and refine procedures involving laboratory animals (the '3Rs'), work in the humanities and social sciences can help understand the social, economic and cultural processes that enhance or impede humane ways of knowing and working with laboratory animals. However, communication across these disciplinary perspectives is currently limited, and they design research programmes, generate results, engage users, and seek to influence policy in different ways. To facilitate dialogue and future research at this interface, we convened an interdisciplinary group of 45 life scientists, social scientists, humanities scholars, non-governmental organisations and policy-makers to generate a collaborative research agenda. This drew on methods employed by other agenda-setting exercises in science policy, using a collaborative and deliberative approach for the identification of research priorities. Participants were recruited from across the community, invited to submit research questions and vote on their priorities. They then met at an interactive workshop in the UK, discussed all 136 questions submitted, and collectively defined the 30 most important issues for the group. The output is a collaborative future agenda for research in the humanities and social sciences on laboratory animal science and welfare. The questions indicate a demand for new research in the humanities and social sciences to inform emerging discussions and priorities on the governance and practice of laboratory animal research, including on issues around: international harmonisation, openness and public engagement, 'cultures of care', harm-benefit analysis and the future of the 3Rs. The process outlined below underlines the value of interdisciplinary exchange for improving communication across different research cultures and identifies ways of enhancing the effectiveness of future research at the interface between the humanities, social sciences, science and science policy.en_US
dc.format.extente0158791 - ?en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofPLoS Oneen_US
dc.rightsCC-BY
dc.subjectAnimal Welfareen_US
dc.subjectAnimalsen_US
dc.subjectCooperative Behavioren_US
dc.subjectHumanitiesen_US
dc.subjectHumansen_US
dc.subjectInterdisciplinary Studiesen_US
dc.subjectLaboratory Animal Scienceen_US
dc.subjectSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.titleDeveloping a Collaborative Agenda for Humanities and Social Scientific Research on Laboratory Animal Science and Welfare.en_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.holder© 2016 Davies et al
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0158791en_US
pubs.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27428071en_US
pubs.issue7en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublished onlineen_US
pubs.volume11en_US
dcterms.dateAccepted2016-06-22en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record