Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFENTON, NEen_US
dc.contributor.authorLagnado, Den_US
dc.contributor.authorDahlman, Cen_US
dc.contributor.authorNeil, Men_US
dc.contributor.authorInternational Conference on AI and the Law (ICAIL 17)en_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-09T10:09:27Z
dc.date.available2017-03-22en_US
dc.date.issued2017-06-12en_US
dc.date.submitted2017-04-30T10:56:49.082Z
dc.identifier.urihttp://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/22709
dc.description.abstractOne of the greatest impediments to the use of probabilistic reasoning in legal arguments is the difficulty in agreeing on an appropriate prior probability for the ultimate hypothesis, (in criminal cases this is normally “Defendant is guilty of the crime for which he/she is accused”). Even strong supporters of a Bayesian approach prefer to ignore priors and focus instead on considering only the likelihood ratio (LR) of the evidence. But the LR still requires the decision maker (be it a judge or juror during trial, or anybody helping to determine beforehand whether a case should proceed to trial) to consider their own prior; without it the LR has limited value. We show that, in a large class of cases, it is possible to arrive at a realistic prior that is also as consistent as possible with the legal notion of ‘innocent until proven guilty’. The approach can be considered as a formalisation of the ‘island problem’ whereby if it is known the crime took place on an island when n people were present, then each of the people on the island has an equal prior probability 1/n of having carried out the crime. Our prior is based on simple location and time parameters that determine both a) the crime scene/time (within which it is certain the crime took place) and b) the extended crime scene/time which is the ‘smallest’ within which it is certain the suspect was known to have been ‘closest’ in location/time to the crime scene. The method applies to cases where we assume a crime has taken place and that it was committed by one person against one other person (e.g. murder, assault, robbery). The paper considers both the practical and legal implications of the approach. We demonstrate how the opportunity prior probability is naturally incorporated into a generic Bayesian network model that allows us to integrate other evidence about the case.en_US
dc.titleThe Opportunity Prior: A Simple and Practical Solution to the Prior Probability Problem for Legal Casesen_US
dc.typeConference Proceeding
dc.rights.holder© The Author(s) 2017
dc.identifier.doi10.1145/3086512.3086519en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusAccepteden_US
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-03-22en_US
qmul.funderEffective Bayesian Modelling with Knowledge before Data::European Research Councilen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record