• Login
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
    Introduction: 'Shooting Niagara - and After?' 
    •   QMRO Home
    • School of Politics & International Relations
    • School of Politics and International Relations
    • Introduction: 'Shooting Niagara - and After?'
    •   QMRO Home
    • School of Politics & International Relations
    • School of Politics and International Relations
    • Introduction: 'Shooting Niagara - and After?'
    ‌
    ‌

    Browse

    All of QMROCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects
    ‌
    ‌

    Administrators only

    Login
    ‌
    ‌

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Introduction: 'Shooting Niagara - and After?'

    View/Open
    Accepted version (40.77Kb)
    Editors
    Gaunt, R
    Volume
    36
    Pagination
    1 - 13 (13)
    Publisher
    Wiley
    Publisher URL
    http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1750-0206
    DOI
    10.1111/1750-0206.12261
    Journal
    Parliamentary History
    Issue
    1
    ISSN
    1750-0206
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    There probably never was since the Heptarchy ended, or almost since it began, so hugely critical an epoch in the history of England as this we have now entered upon, with universal self-congratulation and flinging up of caps; nor one in which … the question of utter death or of nobler new life for the poor Country was so uncertain.1 For Thomas Carlyle, the celebrated Scottish philosopher, melancholic and prophet of doom, the passing of the Second Reform Act in 1867 marked an apocalypse in British history. A constitution that was the inheritance of centuries had been ‘propelled, with ever-increasing velocity’, into ‘the Niagara Rapids’ – not by its enemies, but by those who had claimed to be its friends. Ahead lay only the icy drop, the crash of the waters and the long, terrifying plunge into the chaos of democracy. For Carlyle, what had happened was more than a political revolution. It was as if the moral, spiritual, and intellectual foundations of British society had, in an instant, been dissolved, to be replaced by the ‘Devil-appointed’ principles of ‘swarmery’, ‘anarchy’ and natural equality: ‘any man equal to any other; Quashee Nigger to Socrates or Shakspere [sic]; Judas Iscariot to Jesus Christ’. Mocking those who saw in the bill the coming of the democratic millennium, Carlyle invoked a darker prophetic vision: the unchaining of the Anti-Christ in the latter days, driving a frenzied humanity ‘towards suicide and annihilation’.2
    Authors
    SAUNDERS, R
    URI
    http://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/19400
    Collections
    • School of Politics and International Relations [732]
    Language
    English
    Copyright statements
    © The Parliamentary History Yearbook Trust 2017
    Twitter iconFollow QMUL on Twitter
    Twitter iconFollow QM Research
    Online on twitter
    Facebook iconLike us on Facebook
    • Site Map
    • Privacy and cookies
    • Disclaimer
    • Accessibility
    • Contacts
    • Intranet
    • Current students

    Modern Slavery Statement

    Queen Mary University of London
    Mile End Road
    London E1 4NS
    Tel: +44 (0)20 7882 5555

    © Queen Mary University of London.