Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHurley, MVen_US
dc.contributor.authorWalsh, NEen_US
dc.contributor.authorMitchell, HLen_US
dc.contributor.authorPimm, TJen_US
dc.contributor.authorPatel, Aen_US
dc.contributor.authorWilliamson, Een_US
dc.contributor.authorJones, RHen_US
dc.contributor.authorDieppe, PAen_US
dc.contributor.authorReeves, BCen_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-14T14:49:07Z
dc.date.issued2007-10-15en_US
dc.date.submitted2016-09-20T08:59:07.145Z
dc.identifier.issn0004-3591en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/17633
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: Chronic knee pain is a major cause of disability and health care expenditure, but there are concerns about efficacy, cost, and side effects associated with usual primary care. Conservative rehabilitation may offer a safe, effective, affordable alternative. We compared the effectiveness of a rehabilitation program integrating exercise, self-management, and active coping strategies (Enabling Self-management and Coping with Arthritic Knee Pain through Exercise [ESCAPE-knee pain]) with usual primary care in improving functioning in persons with chronic knee pain. METHODS: We conducted a single-blind, pragmatic, cluster randomized controlled trial. Participants age >/=50 years, reporting knee pain for >6 months, were recruited from 54 inner-city primary care practices. Primary care practices were randomized to continued usual primary care (i.e., whatever intervention a participant's primary care physician deemed appropriate), usual primary care plus the rehabilitation program delivered to individual participants, or usual primary care plus the rehabilitation program delivered to groups of 8 participants. The primary outcome was self-reported functioning (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index physical functioning [WOMAC-func]) 6 months after completing rehabilitation. RESULTS: A total of 418 participants were recruited; 76 (18%) withdrew, only 5 (1%) due to adverse events. Rehabilitated participants had better functioning than participants continuing usual primary care (-3.33 difference in WOMAC-func score; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] -5.88, -0.78; P = 0.01). Improvements were similar whether participants received individual rehabilitation (-3.53; 95% CI -6.52, -0.55) or group rehabilitation (-3.16; 95% CI -6.55, -0.12). CONCLUSION: ESCAPE-knee pain provides a safe, relatively brief intervention for chronic knee pain that is equally effective whether delivered to individuals or groups of participants.en_US
dc.format.extent1211 - 1219en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofArthritis Rheumen_US
dc.subjectAdaptation, Psychologicalen_US
dc.subjectAgeden_US
dc.subjectAged, 80 and overen_US
dc.subjectChronic Diseaseen_US
dc.subjectExercise Therapyen_US
dc.subjectFemaleen_US
dc.subjectHumansen_US
dc.subjectMaleen_US
dc.subjectMiddle Ageden_US
dc.subjectOsteoarthritis, Kneeen_US
dc.subjectSelf Careen_US
dc.subjectTreatment Outcomeen_US
dc.titleClinical effectiveness of a rehabilitation program integrating exercise, self-management, and active coping strategies for chronic knee pain: a cluster randomized trial.en_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/art.22995en_US
pubs.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17907147en_US
pubs.issue7en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden_US
pubs.volume57en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record