Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBhui, Ken_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-21T09:44:49Z
dc.date.available2016-01-13en_US
dc.date.issued2016-04en_US
dc.date.submitted2016-06-20T13:19:03.933Z
dc.identifier.issn2056-4694en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/12979
dc.description.abstractGovernments around the world are uniting in trying to defeat terrorist movements. In this context, recent counter terrorism laws in the UK place public duties on all citizens to help prevent terrorism. Yet, the science of predicting rare events such as terrorist offending yields consistently poor results. There are ethical, clinical and scientific dilemmas facing the professions if we are to investigate social, religious and political belief systems in routine assessment in order to inform judgements about terrorist offending risk. A balanced and evidence-based approach is necessary.en_US
dc.format.extent82 - 84en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofBJPsych Bullen_US
dc.rightsCC-BY
dc.titleFlash, the emperor and policies without evidence: counter-terrorism measures destined for failure and societally divisive.en_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.holder© 2016 The Royal College of Psychiatrists
dc.identifier.doi10.1192/pb.bp.116.053603en_US
pubs.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27087991en_US
pubs.issue2en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden_US
pubs.volume40en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record