Flash, the emperor and policies without evidence: counter-terrorism measures destined for failure and societally divisive.
View/ Open
Volume
40
Pagination
82 - 84
DOI
10.1192/pb.bp.116.053603
Journal
BJPsych Bull
Issue
ISSN
2056-4694
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Governments around the world are uniting in trying to defeat terrorist movements. In this context, recent counter terrorism laws in the UK place public duties on all citizens to help prevent terrorism. Yet, the science of predicting rare events such as terrorist offending yields consistently poor results. There are ethical, clinical and scientific dilemmas facing the professions if we are to investigate social, religious and political belief systems in routine assessment in order to inform judgements about terrorist offending risk. A balanced and evidence-based approach is necessary.
Authors
Bhui, KCollections
- Centre for Psychiatry [916]