• Login
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
    Spelling Out the Noun Phrase: Interpretation, Word Order, and the Problem of `Meaningless Movement' 
    •   QMRO Home
    • Queen Mary University of London Theses
    • Theses
    • Spelling Out the Noun Phrase: Interpretation, Word Order, and the Problem of `Meaningless Movement'
    •   QMRO Home
    • Queen Mary University of London Theses
    • Theses
    • Spelling Out the Noun Phrase: Interpretation, Word Order, and the Problem of `Meaningless Movement'
    ‌
    ‌

    Browse

    All of QMROCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects
    ‌
    ‌

    Administrators only

    Login
    ‌
    ‌

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Spelling Out the Noun Phrase: Interpretation, Word Order, and the Problem of `Meaningless Movement'

    View/Open
    Hall_David_PhD_Final_270116.pdf (1004.Kb)
    Publisher
    Queen Mary University of London
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    This thesis is an investigation of the nature of the syntax-semantics and syntaxphonology interfaces, focusing on the noun phrase. It is argued that, under the assumption that the mapping between syntax and semantics is homomorphic, employing movement operations which do not have semantic effects as an explanatory tool for understanding word-order variation cross-linguistically is undesirable. I argue for the non-existence of head movement as a narrow syntactic operation, on the grounds that it does not produce semantic effects, and I explain apparent head movement effects in terms of the nature of the spell-out operation which maps syntactic structure to phonology. A Direct Linearization theory is proposed in which word-order effects purported to be the result of movement can be derived without appeal to any narrow syntactic operations; the explanatory burden shifts onto the mapping from syntax to phonology, which allows more than one head in a continuous complement line to be spelled out as a single morphological unit; morphological words can spell out at different positions along the extended projection of a root, giving rise to word order variation. I support these claims with two empirical case studies: 1. A study of the interpretation of different noun phrase configurations in Mandarin Chinese and Cantonese shows that the spell-out system proposed in the thesis has better empirical coverage than an analysis which relies on head movement or phrasal movement; 2. An extension to a broader typology of classifier languages shows that the spell-out system proposed can capture an interesting generalization about the licensing of definite interpretations and definite morphology across classifier languages, and that word order variation among DP internal elements (Demonstrative, Numeral, Classifier, Adjective and Noun) in those languages can be derived without recourse to phrasal movement (where that movement has no interpretive effects).
    Authors
    Hall, David
    URI
    http://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/12824
    Collections
    • Theses [3371]
    Copyright statements
    The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without the prior written consent of the author
    Twitter iconFollow QMUL on Twitter
    Twitter iconFollow QM Research
    Online on twitter
    Facebook iconLike us on Facebook
    • Site Map
    • Privacy and cookies
    • Disclaimer
    • Accessibility
    • Contacts
    • Intranet
    • Current students

    Modern Slavery Statement

    Queen Mary University of London
    Mile End Road
    London E1 4NS
    Tel: +44 (0)20 7882 5555

    © Queen Mary University of London.