Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFloyd, Gina Louise Maria
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-13T10:50:09Z
dc.date.available2016-06-13T10:50:09Z
dc.date.issued2016-01-16
dc.date.submitted2016-06-10T15:36:15.383Z
dc.identifier.citationFloyd, G.L.M. 2016, ARE APPEALS TO HUMAN RIGHTS AN EFFECTIVE FRAMING FOR FEMINIST ‘PRO-CHOICE’ DEMANDS IN CHILE? A FEMINIST CRITIQUE. Queen Mary University of London.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/12817
dc.descriptionPhDen_US
dc.description.abstractMy central question asks to what extent the politics of the interpretation of the human rights discourse acts as an obstacle to the legalisation of abortion. To answer this question, I set out the theoretical basis for the feminist critiques of the human rights discourse and its effect on women’s rights. I contend that those in control of informal and formal institutions have control of the interpretation of human rights. I situate this within the historical context, analysing the formal and informal institutional obstacles to feminist policymaking and activism. I analyse the gender ideology that underlies the “pro-life” discourse, and explore the mechanisms by which the “prolife” sector ensures its cultural hegemony, arguing that what occurs in civil society (informal) shapes the formal and informal institutional responses to sexual and reproductive rights. I then assess how this discourse and gender ideology is reflected in the content of political projects related to abortion, thereby highlighting how informal institutions inform formal responses. I conclude by examining the tactics of a section of the radical branch of the feminist movement in Chile today and the innovative measures they utilise in order to challenge, deconstruct, and destabilise the conservative control of the informal institutions of gender norms that shape responses to issues of sexual and reproductive health in Chile. This research is intended to add to analyses seeking to assess the interplay between informal and formal institutions, and the potential this has in isolating entry points for advocacy and activism. I argue that the way to legalisation must proceed via shifting the discourse.
dc.description.sponsorshipSchool of Politics and International Relationsen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherQueen Mary University of Londonen_US
dc.subjectPoliticsen_US
dc.subjectsexual and reproductive rightsen_US
dc.titleARE APPEALS TO HUMAN RIGHTS AN EFFECTIVE FRAMING FOR FEMINIST ‘PRO-CHOICE’ DEMANDS IN CHILE? A FEMINIST CRITIQUEen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.rights.holderThe copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without the prior written consent of the author


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Theses [3188]
    Theses Awarded by Queen Mary University of London

Show simple item record