Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWolff, Sen_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-03T09:29:50Z
dc.date.issued2015-12-01en_US
dc.date.submitted2016-02-23T11:36:28.995Z
dc.identifier.issn0033-3298en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/12650
dc.description.abstract© 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Maintaining mostly a national and EU-level focus, the transnational dimension has been overlooked in the policy instrumentation literature. Seeking to fill this gap, this article researches the factors that shape the choice and evolution of policy instruments in transnational administrations, namely above and beyond the state. In an empirical analysis of budget support, it finds that the preference of the European Commission for this development aid instrument is dependent upon transnational agency and EU domestic habitat. This is evidenced in three steps. First, conflicting global objectives and institutional strategies of re-legitimization provided transnational administrative agency with power and leverage to promote managerial norms over developmental ones. Second, transnational knowledge networks have provided the European Commission venues of socialization to maintain its monopoly over the instrument. Third, the de-politicized transnational logic of budget support as a managerial tool is correlated to an increased politicization by some EU member states.en_US
dc.format.extent922 - 939en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofPublic Administrationen_US
dc.titleEu budget support as a transnational policy instrument: Above and beyond the state?en_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.holder© 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/padm.12177en_US
pubs.issue4en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden_US
pubs.volume93en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record