Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorManchanda, Ren_US
dc.contributor.authorGodfrey, Men_US
dc.contributor.authorWong-Taylor, LAen_US
dc.contributor.authorHalaska, MJen_US
dc.contributor.authorBurnell, Men_US
dc.contributor.authorGrabowski, JPen_US
dc.contributor.authorGultekin, Men_US
dc.contributor.authorHaidopoulos, Den_US
dc.contributor.authorZapardiel, Ien_US
dc.contributor.authorVranes, Ben_US
dc.contributor.authorKesic, Ven_US
dc.contributor.authorZola, Pen_US
dc.contributor.authorColombo, Nen_US
dc.contributor.authorVerheijen, Ren_US
dc.contributor.authorBossart, Men_US
dc.contributor.authorPiek, Jen_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-05-09T12:57:32Z
dc.date.issued2013-04en_US
dc.date.submitted2016-01-29T21:26:22.691Z
dc.identifier.urihttp://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/12226
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Primary data on training experiences of European gynaecological oncology trainees are lacking. This study aims to evaluate trainee profile, satisfaction and factors affecting the training experience in gynaecological oncology in Europe. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A web-based anonymous survey sent to ENYGO members/trainees in July 2011. It included sociodemographic information and a 22-item (1-5 Likert scale) questionnaire evaluating training experience in gynaecological oncology. Chi-square tests were used for evaluating the independence of categorical variables and t-test (parametric)/Mann-Whitney (non-parametric) tests for differences between two independent groups on continuous data. Cluster analysis was used to identify groupings in multivariate data and Cronbach's-alpha for questionnaire reliability. A multivariable linear regression model was used to assess the effect of variables on training satisfaction. RESULTS: One hundred and nineteen gynaecological-oncology trainees from 31 countries responded. The mean age was 37.4 (S.D, 5.3) years and 55.5% were in accredited training posts. Two clusters identified in the cohort (Calinski-Harabasz, CH = 47.35) differed mainly by accredited training (P = 0.003). The training-satisfaction score (TSS) had high reliability (Cronbach's alpha, 0.951) and was significantly associated with accredited posts (P < 0.0005), years of training (P = 0.001) and salary (P = 0.002). The TSS was independent of age (P = 0.360), working hours (P = 0.620), overtime-pay (P = 0.318), annual leave (P = 0.933), gender (P = 0.545) and marital status (P = 0.731). Accredited programme trainees scored significantly higher than others in 17 of 22 aspects of training. The areas of greater need included advanced laparoscopic/urological/colorectal surgery, radiation oncology, palliative-care, cancer genetics and research opportunities. CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate the importance of accredited training and the need for harmonisation of gynaecological oncology training within Europe.en_US
dc.format.extent944 - 952en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAnn Oncolen_US
dc.subjectAdulten_US
dc.subjectEducation, Medical, Continuingen_US
dc.subjectEuropeen_US
dc.subjectFemaleen_US
dc.subjectHumansen_US
dc.subjectMaleen_US
dc.subjectMedical Oncologyen_US
dc.subjectNeoplasmsen_US
dc.subjectPalliative Careen_US
dc.subjectSurveys and Questionnairesen_US
dc.subjectWorkforceen_US
dc.titleThe need for accredited training in gynaecological oncology: a report from the European Network of Young Gynaecological Oncologists (ENYGO).en_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.holder© The Author 2012.
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/annonc/mds588en_US
pubs.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23172637en_US
pubs.issue4en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden_US
pubs.volume24en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record