Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKatori, Ten_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-04-13T10:47:14Z
dc.date.submitted2016-04-01T19:54:47.819Z
dc.identifier.urihttp://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/11814
dc.description11 pages, 8 figures, proceedings of the 36th International Conference on High Energy Physics (ICHEP2012), Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, July 4-11, 2012
dc.description11 pages, 8 figures, proceedings of the 36th International Conference on High Energy Physics (ICHEP2012), Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, July 4-11, 2012en_US
dc.description.abstractLorentz violation is a predicted phenomenon from the Planck scale physics. Although the three active massive neutrino framework with the Standard Model (SM), so-called the neutrino Standard Model (nuSM), is successful, series of signals not understood within the nuSM suggest neutrino physics may be the first place to see the physics beyond the SM, such as Lorentz violation. Especially, neutrino oscillations are the natural interferometer and they are sensitive to the Lorentz violation. The LSND oscillation signal was analyzed under the Standard Model Extension (SME) framework, and it was found that the oscillation data was consistent with no Lorentz violation, but data cannot reject Lorentz violation hypothesis with order ~10^{-17}. By assuming LSND signal was due to the Lorentz violation, a global phenomenological model was made to describe all known oscillation data including the LSND signal. The model also predicted the signal for MiniBooNE at the low energy region. Later, MiniBooNE announced an event excess at the low energy region. However, the oscillation candidate signals from MiniBooNE were consistent with no Lorentz violation. The limit obtained by MiniBooNE and MINOS on the e-mu sector reject the simple scenario to explain LSND signal with Lorentz violation. Meantime, MINOS and IceCube set tight limits on the mu-tau sector Lorentz violation. The last untested channel, the e-tau Lorentz violating mixing, was tested using reactor disappearance data from Double Chooz. However, Double Chooz data was consistent with flat, and sidereal time dependent Lorentz violation hypothesis is rejected. Combinations of all oscillation data from LSND, MiniBooNE, MINOS, IceCube, and Double Chooz provide very tight constraint for a possible Lorentz violation in the neutrino sector in terrestrial level.en_US
dc.rightsarXiv record: http://arxiv.org/abs/1211.7129
dc.subjecthep-phen_US
dc.subjecthep-phen_US
dc.titleTests of Lorentz and CPT violation with neutrinosen_US
dc.typeArticle
pubs.author-urlhttp://arxiv.org/abs/1211.7129v1en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record