Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWalden, INen_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-05-25T09:01:34Z
dc.date.accessioned2011-05-26T10:30:19Z
dc.date.issued2010en_US
dc.identifier.issn0267-3649en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/1078
dc.descriptionNOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Computer Law and Security Report. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Computer Law and Security Report, [VOL 26, ISSUE 2, (201)] DOI: 10.1016/j.clsr.2010.01.003en_US
dc.description.abstractThis article examines the Advocate-General's comments on the `hosting' provision in the eCommerce Directive (00/31/EC). He suggests the existence of a `neutrality' principle in respect of intermediary liability, which operates irrespective of an intermediary's knowledge about the legality or otherwise of the hosted content. This article critically examines this suggestion within the broader debate about the role and responsibilities of intermediaries in a cyberspace context.en_US
dc.format.extent203 - 209en_US
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.ispartofComputer Law & Security Reviewen_US
dc.relation.replaceshttp://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/jspui/handle/123456789/1058
dc.relation.replaces123456789/1058
dc.titleMine host is searching for a ‘neutrality’ principle!en_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.clsr.2010.01.003en_US
pubs.issue2en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublisheden_US
pubs.volume26en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record