Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKoutoukidis, DAen_US
dc.contributor.authorBeeken, RJen_US
dc.contributor.authorManchanda, Ren_US
dc.contributor.authorMichalopoulou, Men_US
dc.contributor.authorBurnell, Men_US
dc.contributor.authorKnobf, MTen_US
dc.contributor.authorLanceley, Aen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-12-15T15:57:36Z
dc.date.available2017-08-03en_US
dc.date.issued2017-10-08en_US
dc.date.submitted2017-11-29T23:02:18.768Z
dc.identifier.urihttp://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/30603
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: Healthy eating and physical activity may help endometrial cancer survivors (ECS) improve their quality of life. However, most ECS do not meet the relevant guidelines. This pilot trial aimed to test the study feasibility procedures for a definitive trial of a behavioural lifestyle programme. DESIGN AND SETTING: This 24-week parallel two-arm randomised pilot trial took place in two hospitals in London, UK (April 2015-June 2016). PARTICIPANTS: Sixty disease-free ECS within 3 years of diagnosis. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomised using minimisation to receive the intervention or care as usual. The 'Shape-Up following cancer treatment' programme used self-monitoring, goal-setting, self-incentives, problem-solving and group social support for 12 hours over 8 weeks to help survivors improve their eating and physical activity. OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measures were recruitment, adherence, and retention rates. Further outcomes included barriers to participation and feedback on programme satisfaction. RESULTS: Of the 296 potentially eligible ECS, 20% (n=60) were randomly allocated to the active intervention (n=29) or control group (n=31). Three participants in each arm were deemed ineligible after randomisation and excluded from analysis. Twenty participants (77%; 95% CI 61% to 93%) adhered to the intervention and provided generally favourable feedback. At 24 weeks, 25/26 (96%; 95% CI 89% to 100%) intervention and 24/28 (86%; 95% CI 73% to 99%) control participants completed their assessment. No intervention-related adverse events were reported. Among eligible survivors who declined study participation (n=83), inconvenience (78%; 95% CI 69% to 87%) was the most common barrier. CONCLUSIONS: The trial was feasible to deliver based on the a priori feasibility criteria. Enhancing recruitment and adherence in a definitive trial will require designs that promote convenience and consider ECS-reported barriers. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02433080; Pre-results. TRIAL FUNDING: University College London, St. Bartholomew's Hospital Nurses League, and NIHR University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre.en_US
dc.format.extente018015 - ?en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofBMJ Openen_US
dc.subjectEndometrial canceren_US
dc.subjectbehaviour changeen_US
dc.subjecthealthy eatingen_US
dc.subjectinterventionen_US
dc.subjectphysical activityen_US
dc.subjectsurvivorshipen_US
dc.subjectAdulten_US
dc.subjectCancer Survivorsen_US
dc.subjectEndometrial Neoplasmsen_US
dc.subjectExerciseen_US
dc.subjectFemaleen_US
dc.subjectHealth Behavioren_US
dc.subjectHealthy Lifestyleen_US
dc.subjectHumansen_US
dc.subjectPatient Complianceen_US
dc.subjectPatient Selectionen_US
dc.subjectPilot Projectsen_US
dc.subjectQuality of Lifeen_US
dc.subjectSelf Careen_US
dc.subjectSingle-Blind Methoden_US
dc.subjectSocial Supporten_US
dc.titleRecruitment, adherence, and retention of endometrial cancer survivors in a behavioural lifestyle programme: the Diet and Exercise in Uterine Cancer Survivors (DEUS) parallel randomised pilot trial.en_US
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.holder(c) The Authors, 2017.
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018015en_US
pubs.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28993394en_US
pubs.issue10en_US
pubs.notesNot knownen_US
pubs.publication-statusPublished onlineen_US
pubs.volume7en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record